Thursday, May 7, 2009

Obama gives biofuels the big thumbs up

clipped from www.whitehouse.gov
President Obama
announced steps to further his Administration’s commitment to advance biofuels research and commercialization
a Biofuels Interagency Working Group, to be co-chaired by the Secretaries of Agriculture and Energy and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
This Working Group will work with the National Science and Technology Council's Biomass Research and Development Board in undertaking its work
Develop the nation’s first comprehensive biofuel market development program
The President also announced that $786.5 million from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act will be provided to accelerate advanced biofuels research and development and expand commercialization by providing additional funding for commercial biorefineries
The new categories include:



  • Cellulosic biofuels;






  • Biomass-based diesel;






  • Advanced biofuels; and






  • Total renewable fuel.



  • blog it
    On the surface this may seem like a good idea, but the mandate to, by 2022, have up to 15 billion gallons of corn ethanol counted toward the 36 billion gallon biofuel production level will only worsen its effect on food production. We’re at 6-9 billion gallons of corn ethanol now and with all the havoc that has wreaked on agriculture worldwide, the concept of almost tripling that amount over the next 20-odd years is terrifying. What may yet save us is the fact that it will likely prove a simply impossible standard to meet.

    And the fact that the administration’s rationale for expanding the use of biofuels continues to be the misplaced desire “to reduce our dependence on foreign oil” is just ludicrous. Addressing climate change WILL reduce our dependence on foreign oil. But simply reducing dependence on foreign oil won’t save the planet—only zeroing out our carbon emissions will do that. So energy policy in this country must be seen through that one, single lens.

    1 comment:

    T. Wooldridge said...

    Absolutely agree with you. Obama's team needs to take a look at how to solve this problem without affecting food production and economics. Besides, corn ethanol has a higher emissions, when you take into account what is required to grow corn, process it and and transport it. Shouldn't we be looking at the total net effect of the reduction, not just what shoots out the end of your tailpipe? To not look at the total net effect of emissions is simply irresponsible.